Yogesh Mishra
Raipur,
May 11, 2013
Congress is effervescing after Karnataka victory. Though it was an
anticipated result, the Congress leaders are giving all credit to their vice
president Rahul Gandhi despite knowing that his presence in Uttar Pradesh
assembly polls last year did not make much difference to party’s dismal
performance. With Chhattisgarh going to assembly polls in the offing, state
Congress unit too pins hope on Gandhi to turn the tide in party’s favour.
However, unlike Karnataka, the party will have tough ride in Chhattisgarh
because while former’s result was based on political disturbance, the latter’s
outcome will depend on contending parties’ capability to win public acceptance.
In Chhattisgarh,
there is no Yeddy (BJP’s former Karnataka CM BS Yeddyyurappa) factor that
Congress could cash in on in polls. In fact, despite Congress’ allegations that
chief minister Raman Singh is directly involved in several graft cases
including Pushp Steel matter, the BJP’s national leadership has by far shown
full faith on him.
Yes! The CM
looks alienated as his government’s much-hyped vikas yatra does not seem
getting adequate support from the party as was announced before its
commencement, however, it could also be termed as BJP’s cautious move after
Congress alleged that the ruling party wanted to take political mileage from
the yatra.
Of course,
everything is not okay in BJP, but it happens with every party that completes
two full terms at the helm. Factionalism has by far not been a major threat to
the party’s integrity as despite nurturing their personal ambitions, the senior
BJP leaders think of party first during polls. So, the Congress is least likely
to get advantage of BJP’s internal politics. Rather, as compared to Karnataka,
BJP in Chhattisgarh is stable.
Contrarily,
Congress is fragmented. Infighting is at its peak in the party. There are half
a dozen factions and equal number of chief ministerial candidates in the party.
The state unit president Nandkumar Patel has completely failed to earn trust of
different factions. The dissidents, instead of going to him for solution,
prefer putting their stance before party’s national leaders. Some even claim to
have direct link with party supremo Sonia Gandhi.
In Congress,
every senior leader behaves like a party chief. Patel, on the other hand, seems
heading only a handful of workers. He looks helpless before senior leader Ajit
Jogi who invariably goes against partyline and organises events and meetings
across the state. Patel also poses silence when party MLA Badruddin Quraishi
wages war of words against him, AICC treasurer Motilal Vora and CLP leader
Ravindra Choubey. A disciplinary committee does exist in the party but is
non-functional since its constitution.
Nonetheless,
the party is confident of coming to power in Chhattisgarh this time. Hence, it
has announced to finalise candidates three months prior to polls. There are 90
assembly constituencies in state. For every constituency, there are 10-15 aspirants
in the party from different factions. To pick right candidate, the national
leadership is conducting survey, though it is less likely to be accepted by all.
So, will the
party, which has history of selecting candidates on basis of recommendations, suddenly
adopt a new method of screening prospects? Of course not, at least not in
Chhattisgarh. The idea of survey is given by Rahul Gandhi for transparent
selection of candidates, but if the state leadership would fail to tell him
about the repercussions of application of his formula, no wonder Congress would
have to face embarrassing polls debacle.
The party is
presently taking out parivartan yatra and door-to-door campaign in state. A
couple of party’s national leaders have addressed public rallies under
parivartan yatra. However, it is expected to bring Rahul Gandhi before the
crowd. In fact, Gandhi needs to give more time to Chhattisgarh if state unit really
wants to keep the morale of its workers high and take advantage of
anti-incumbency factor in polls. The presence of Gandhi would also check
further polarisation in party and the factions would remain in discipline.
No comments:
Post a Comment